Follow
Share
Read More
This discussion has been closed for comment. Start a New Discussion.
I just switched over to the new site from the old and I was already signed in, that was nice!
Does anybody know how much longer it will be until the old site is closed down?
(1)
Report

Good suggestions, Jeanne.
(0)
Report

Dear all,

I'm still clinging to the old site. But good question cwillie, I, too, wonder when the old site will be no longer.
(4)
Report

cdnreader, I am hoping some time late next year :)
(2)
Report

As I said in a prior post, but one thing I noticed when I went into it a few minutes ago is that responses and some full posts are missing. It does not appear that if you respond or ask a question in classic view it does not migrate to the New Aging Care site and vice-versa. Otherwise it is great.
(1)
Report

Since this has come to the top again I'll mention two things I dislike about the new site:

1 When you read the list of topics on the forum page from left to right the last question/comment is always cut in half, first missing the right side and then the left so reading it is a pita

2 The news feed doesn't tell you how many new comments there have been so you need to visit each thread to check that you aren't missing something.
(2)
Report

Cwillie,
You might have just had the last word on the new website.
But the offer to visit the new website has been removed.
Where'd it go?
(2)
Report

Hi all,
Thanks for your recent comments and questions regarding the move toward the new AgingCare. We are on track to transition to the new site soon, and as we go we have been making updates to include your feedback. We anticipated making the full transition to the new site this week, so we disabled the "toggle" to the preview site. Many of you have requested we bring it back, so we are working right now on reinstating that feature while we finish the transition. Each week ends with updates to address issues you all have found. It is really important to continue to let us know if you find any "bugs" related to our updates. Until the toggle can be pushed back into production the new site is alive and well at
https://preview.agingcare.com
See you there soon ;-)
(2)
Report

Wish I had a teenager in the house to show me around the new website when it is the only format that one can use :P

I use to be really good at diving into a new website and learning every corner of it, but as I get older, I just cannot focus like I use to :(
(2)
Report

I've found that it's hard on my eyes - too much scrolling.
(1)
Report

Ok, time to have my dH give the new website a once-over.
He was experienced in website development (unpaid) and continues to be a self-taught techie.
Wondering if I will have to beg him....
(1)
Report

I have started having issues with uploading new avatars. The size limitation by AC is reasonable at 5mb. I have tried a couple under 5mb but they either are blurred if uploaded, or will not upload, receive an error, that the pic must be less than 5mb, which they are. What's up?
(1)
Report

Hm, that might explain why some avatars are blank in the new site.
I'm still switching between old and new to get the best features from each.

Something weird that I've noticed is that my spell check is very inconsistent on the new site 🤔
(1)
Report

One good thing is that I get some exercise trying to read my News Feed on the new site. I have to lean forward to read the name of the poster and when the answer was posted. Then I have to lean back and sit up straight to read the post.

At least it's given me a chance to exercise while I read.

But that light turquoise print is too hard on the eyes; it's beautiful, reminds me of a tropical, sea, but it's not appropriate for reading, especially against the glare of far too much white space.
(1)
Report

I don't know who says the new site is compatible with smartphones, but it surely is not.

Everything is too small to see. It seems there's too much stuff squished in on the screen at once. It's terrible to tap on these small options, even using my stylis.

My screen is 6". The very top has the website. Below that has the AC header, below that has one question with a bit of the next question next to it. Horizontally of course. Below that has the answer bubble an the profile pic and name of the first or last commenter. I know that order can be changed. Under that is a another horizontal scrolling bar with topics, some articles and advertising.

Mind you this is only halfway down my screen. So all this is on a 3x2.5 screen. I don't even remember what the bottom half of the screen consists of.

My point is, there is way too much going on, when a smartphone is used. So how in the world was this geared towards these devices?

There is barely any contrast. Seeing anything is a horrible strain.

I'm going back in to see what the bottom 3" has going on.

I doubt these issues will be changed, but I had to explain my struggles with it. 
Ty
(0)
Report

I think I just assumed that changes were made to accommodate the fact that many - most? - people are using hand held devices to surf the web nowadays. If the changes aren't compatible with that reality then I really can't see the point, if the changes in fact make reading on a phone or tablet more difficult then you have to wonder if AgingCare's tech and development departments have totally lost touch.
(4)
Report

Searches for specific questions are very frustrating. There is no rhyme or reason to results. For example I just searched for questions related to best cell phones. Several pages of hits in no particular order. I just found out about a new phone product that is a watch with a GPS locator. Want to let others know about it but where?

Many often hit results are so old they are not even open to a additional posts any longer.
(2)
Report

I always thought the site search was pretty dismal. It would be nice to be able to narrow the search to just articles if that is what you are looking for and to have the answers in some kind of chronological order. Sometimes when I can't find something I know I've read on the forum I have better luck using google - I just add agingcare to my search parameters.
(2)
Report

I also have problems trying to find a certain article. Now I need to go to CARE TOPICS [see blue/green bar at the top of your screen]. Then I need to think what "subject" is that question under. Lot of roaming involved :P

But I do like this website format better then the new & improved one of a few months ago. This is more like the old tried and true format that I know and love.
(2)
Report

Some suggestions

When someone joins they can't post until they give some background.
Age of loved one would help. Dementia/ALZ or not. Age related is not Dementia.

A way of contacting you to stop a post. We can report a reply but not the original post.

It was said when we went to the new format that the old posts would stay up for the info but you would stop them from being posted to. There are a few still coming up recently that have thousands of posts.
(1)
Report

I just checked the questions asked in the Profile because I noticed people were saying they were caring for mother and the mother was 19 years old.

Ah ha, now I see why this is happening. Profile asks for a date of birth. Well, the writer puts in their own date of birth instead of the person for whom they are caring. Same with asking for a first name. Does the website what the writer's first name, or the name of the person for whom they are caring.

Also, need to add mother-in-law and father-in-law as a choice to the list of people one is caring.
(2)
Report

One thing AC has said they will add to profile is an option for former caregiver. Then how long were you a caregiver? Status of person you cared for? Alive or passed or now in a facility? Seems the closest they can come is an option of "Other". Hmmm.

Never mind, "other" option is for where they are living. Passed s not an option.
(1)
Report

I’d like to see less spam.

seems like “a place for mom” is allowed to spam us with advertisements for their services. It’s a shame these ads are posted by posters with the “expert” designation.
(0)
Report

This discussion has been closed for comment. Start a New Discussion.
Start a Discussion
Subscribe to
Our Newsletter