help me advice please mom in hospital took her off of her meds she has been on put her on zyprexa do not wANT HER ON THIS SHE IS MORE confused then ever I want to bring home continue her meds was on what can I do want to send her to pysch hospital to experiment I feel no she has dementia
It is not hypercritical to be request enough clarity to understand what has been asked. We all understand and forgive typos. The text does not have to be elegant.
I always question doctors when they give me a vague answer.
My Mom's kidney doctor had her on four different high blood pressure medications!
I ran out of one of them, and it made no difference in her high blood pressure level.
I asked the doctor if we could discontinue the medication since it did nothing.
She didn't have an answer, but wanted her to continue taking it.
I think they were more interested in pushing drugs and making money than my Mom's health.
DO realize that most people do not get most side effects, or nothing would be left on the market :-) and keep a running list of definite side effects, especially if you can confirm them and they are to things that are most commonly used.
I think the reason you got questioned at first is that something happened that could have made someone ask if the previous meds were actually not working. I think all of us have had cases where the person thinks they are having a side effect but it is really the condition changing. I have people who come back after a surgery that was hopefully going to help their child walk - they may say something like 2 years ago my child was walking and now after the operation they can't anymore! But, what they are not remembering is that they had stopped walking and that is why they decided to have the surgery...it just did not turn out as well as hoped.
There are also some big egos outside it.
Doctors' communication skills are generally pretty woeful (I blame their training - it seems to cover no middle ground between e.g. cryptogenic fibrosing alveolitis and "oo dear you've got a bit of a nasty chest there") vs.
They are often trying to explain extremely specialised concepts to people who have not spent four or five years in medical school.
They do not always apply their extensive knowledge and full concentration to a particular situation vs.
"When you hear hoofbeats, think 'horses' not 'zebras.'" In other words, their own clinical experience, lack of time and gambling odds all conspire to push doctors towards the obvious answer or the easiest course of treatment - so they jump to conclusions, and unfortunately that often means that they jump over us.
Particularly in the context of the forum, many patients a) have complex, competing co-morbidities and b) have a lousy prognosis. Our loved ones are likely to decline and die no matter how gifted, thoughtful, well-equipped and efficient their medical team. We need to accept that sometimes there aren't any good answers: the doctors may not be completely right, but that doesn't make us any righter.
Communication being a two-way street, we need to play our part by dealing openly and courteously with professionals while explaining our concerns as clearly as possible. But by and large, I believe it's wrong and self-defeating to ask for medical advice and then ignore it or overrule it. That belief is currently being tested to destruction - wish me luck and I'll let you know how this morning's telephone consult. goes!
With regard to "experimenting" at a psych hospital, i believe what is being offered is in house psychiatric unit where they can trial meds to get the patient stable. Sandy, I hope things are going better!
There are forty good answers here, hopefully she'll be able to read them and go from there.
My only advice is not to be afraid of the drugs the doctor ordered. Like I said before, that particular drug is only ordered by a psychiatrist or at least that was how it was in both Massachusetts and FL.
And it helped my mother immensely despite the bad reviews it got from my 'kids'.
Everyone is different. What works for one may not work for another. But you have to give these drugs a certain amount of time to actually kick in. As they are kicking in, sometimes the side effects aren't so great. I'd give it a good three to four weeks, unless you are seeing something majorly wrong.
You need to rest while you can if she's still in the hospital. Also, do some homework, i.e., Google the name of the drug and try to look for references related to hospitals, not people's reviews. If you have concerns, do not be afraid to ask the doctor. S/he won't bite. S/he's a person, not a god.
I will be thinking about you.
my sis tried to run the intensive care unit when mom was in there based on all the med tv shows sis has watched . i generously offered to have her tossed out of the hospital .
everything is based on science , bloodwork and federal guidelines . docs arent just taking wild guesses .
And, short answer is no, they did not teach much at all about dementia in medical school when I went through - they did not really KNOW that much back then - and even now, probably they don't do nearly enough. At UAMS we do have a strong geriatric presence and I think they do get involved in the med student curriculum, but familiarity with the legal and funding aspects (aka "systems of service") is still not great among students or residents.
You will still run into docs who seem to expect that everyone should respond to what I call cookie-cutter medicine, and just kind of get mad or frustrated and blame the patient when things do not work the way they are supposed to. Some, even most of us care deeply about our patients and will take the time and energy to think things through, revise a diagnosis or treatment plan and listen well...some of us are either burnouts or just never really cared enough in the first place. Those "80%ers" among us will meet the standard of care or practice that does work 80% of the time, but go no further. And they said if we ever stopped learning, we'd be at the bottom 10% of our profession in 10-15 years, but today its even faster than that, but some old curmudgeonly types unfortunately think ALL the old ways are better and common sense is all they really need. In their defense, you really can get burned by people who believe every d*mn thing they read on the internet or who have decided all meds are poisons and all therapies are scams, and right up front before they even know you as a human being they have clearly decided you must be getting kickbacks and withholding information and care for fun and profit.
Just my $0.02!!
I asked about side effects, and the doc said yes, there is a risk of stroke. I said something like, "y'all, he's had two of those already." Which he has, and I'm surprised the doc forgot about all that. But he didn't push that blood thinner any more.
Do I have POA? Well, kinda sorta. But the doctors know me, and my type-A, borderline pushy nature does help. So does stating my objections with a few well-placed questions.
Unless you have extensive medical training, you cannot possibly understand all the possibilities, downsides and upsides of each treatment. Yes, your risk stroke with certain blood thinners, but you also risk stroke NOT being on them. Yes, less is more in terms of meds for the elderly, but some meds bring better quality of life. I think we should all listen a little harder.