I'm in a situation where one of my father has gone through the process of doing all of their estate planning with a trust, a POA, directive and will. Since that happened a little over a year ago the only information my father has shared with me are some vague details about what I will be getting and that I will be the executor. Recently I have seen some actions from my father that are making me question if that is actually what he has in his estate plans.
Legally I have no right to see this, and I have simply asked if this is something I can see, minus that I have been very honest in saying that I would be happy to take on the role if that is what the documents say, but that my default position is that I'm assuming that I will get nothing. With that being said what has me more concerned are the details surrounding his POA and health directives. I know he has both, but I have no idea who has been named. I have asked him multiple times directly if he can either tell me who has been named or to just tell me that he would prefer not to tell me but every time he evades the question. His current mental state is that he is legally able to make his own decisions but we are seeing early stages of what might be cognitive decline.
This puts me in the position where if something was to happen I would literally not know who to contact if I got a call. For all that I know I could be named, but based on our family dynamics there are other members of the family that I would fully expect to take legal action if I did anything that is not 110% by the book just to cause trouble. Though I am always one to run clean books with my own business this is a situation where I feel like I need to be extra careful.
Because of that I told him that if he refuses to tell me who I would need to contact then to the best of my knowledge the only thing I could legally tell someone would be that there are directives and POA's in place to the best of my knowledge but I have no idea who it is. Following on from there to my knowledge it seems like from a legal standpoint my only choice would be to not enter his house, or take on any of these roles and likewise make sure that nobody else does unless they can provide legal documentation giving them the right to do so or unless I am presented with documentation giving me the legal right to take on this role.
Am I missing anything with this? My intent is to be able to help and I would be willing to take on these roles if that was what he wanted and it is done 100% legally and ethically. But at the same time I'm really struggling with the reluctance to just tell me who I would need to contact if something happened. My goals are to be ethical, and to do everything by the book. (avoiding lawsuits etc.)
First the POA is only active while the person is alive.
Second, after death the Will is in force and the Executor is in charge.
Third, as an old person myself, I don't want my family bugging me for all the darn details, because it opens up a can of worms.
So stop asking him. Show a little respect.
The only way to prove that you are not interested in what you are getting is to stop asking about it.
The original question was : "Parent won't give POA information. Any advice?"
Now replies have slid into questions about wills a very different subject.
I don't see any reply where pamstegma is telling anyone to lie.
I have a sibling who has decided not to share. I have received calls from people have been given my name to call. I refer the caller to the sibling's attorney.
Sharing things such as wills does open a can of worms IMCO. In my own situation I have a file of life on the fridge containing all POA's and such but no private family stuff. This pack of documents goes to anyone with a need to know
So sorry you have to go thru this. Just one more thing to worry about. Good Luck.
PS, maybe you could take him to hi lawyer and he can explain the importance. Sometimes others can get thru better than children.
An Exacutor with out written and signed document(BY YOUR FATHER AND WITNESSES)PEFFERABLT NOTARISED, will prove you are the EXACUTOR,
Other wise you are ä king with out a kingdome". Do not think you are because if you were your father would present the document to you. I suspect he wants to avoid a confrontation with you NOW, as well as between you and your siblings if you have any. From personal experience this sibling confrontation will happen when it is time to execute the will. Ask your father to prevent this situation, and answer the few questions you have. Good Luck.
Plan to not inherit anything. Plan to decline the executorship and let the second take care of it. Move along, live your life free of worry about your parent. Avoid getting sucked into that black hole of continuous, never-ending drama and needs. It's pretty clear you are cut out of everything except the work. An earlier writer noted that dementia can go on for years and years; living in a dementia unit is about $5000 to $7000 per month now. Who knows how much in the future, so the estate will be eaten up in care expenses anyway. Leave all that mess to someone else. Let go and let God.
Have you ever offered to accompany him to a visit with his PCP? You might try this so that you become acquainted with his medical provider. I would look at this as a trust building exercise. He may have lifelong trust issues (as my MIL did) and they are extremely hard to overcome if those issues are simply a built-in part of someone's personality. If this is the case, your father will interpret your every action as a ploy to get his money, so be aware of that.
I would focus on helping him get good healthcare and forget about the rest.
I agree that it is mighty strange for your father not to tell you if you have either financial or medical POA or both. Mighty strange isn't against the law, but it is against his best interests. A logical conclusion is that you are not POA or Medical Proxy. We don't know that for sure, but it seems like a good bet, yes?
Let us say that Dad has a stroke or a bad fall and needs temporary help. In walzes a somewhat younger girlfriend who has been in the picture but behind the scenes for a long time. Oh, lets go all-out soap opera here. It is a younger boyfriend who shows up, POA documents in hand, and starts handling your Dad's finances. Hmm, no wonder Dad was a bit secretive, eh? But how would your life be different/better if you know that right this minute?
BTW, if Dad is smart, he has given a copy of his advance directive to his PCP and other medical facilities he uses. I notice they all ask if you have one. So they would know who to contact.
And what if Dad has left a huge chunk of the estate to this "friend" -- how would knowing that tomorrow make any difference?
I understand the concern about highjacking the inheritance. We've seen that scenario on this forum. But I don't see how knowing all the details about your dad's estate planning protects you from that. So you find out that you are both DPOA and Medical POA this week. And dad goes downhill, but not to the point of being declared incompetent, and a year from now he sets up new POAs giving authority to his caregiver or his high school sweetheart or his lawyer. He can do that at any time, as long as he is still competent. So what would you gain from knowing all the details today? How would that protect you from the highjacking scenario?
If that book tells you what to do and how it protects your interests, share! We love to learn from each other.
Your Dad is in his seventies. (So am I.) He has started repeating stories he has told before. (I do too. In fact among my peers we commonly start a story by saying "I don't remember who I've told this to, so stop me if you've heard this ...") He is showing some other non-specified signs of cognitive decline. But he set up his estate plans a year ago, before these signs started showing up, so presumably he was in his right mind when he made them. Right?
If, in fact, Dad is in the beginning stages of dementia, his care is going to be VERY expensive. And it could go on for 20 years or more. That will eat up huge amounts of the estate. So much so that worrying about what is left is simply not worthwhile.
The best kind of check-and-balance is to maintain a loving relationship with your father. Take an interest in his life. Visit often. See that he gets the best care available if he does,in fact, decline significantly.
And for heaven's sake, quit bugging him to tell you what he doesn't want to tell you. You are coming across (inaccurately I hope) as being overly interested in his money. That doesn't put any parent in a confiding mood.
You can't always get someone's intent via e-mail, but in the cast of the comment about the lawyer that was made to take pretty literally. If you go to Google and type in "should you be secretive with your estate plans" every lawyer recommends against it on the first three pages of the search results and then they trail off to topics not related to this from what I saw. Does that mean every lawyer feels that way no, does that mean there are exceptions to that rule....yes.
But that still does leave the estate open to theft.
Some resources and much longer scenarios:
oprah/money/What-to-Do-When-a-Family-Member-Abuses-an-Inheritance
rcadamski.Articles/What-is-inheritance-hijacking-and-why-is-it-a-problem-to-us-all.shtml
stopinheritancetheft.blogspot/2008/01/my-brother-stole-my-inheritance-can-you.html
pennyborn/inheritancetheft.html
askthepsychatp/2008/08/04/stealing-family-inheritance/
hubpages/money/How-to-steal-your-inheritance
A typical scenario. You have a aging parent who for years had always told you they were leaving you a piece of the estate. Then their health and mental ability deteriorates. Now a uncle/aunt/niece/nephew or caregiver enters the picture. One of these players uses a number of techniques to convince the elder to give them the power of attorney, or uses past events to convince them that their children are out to get them etc.. Next thing you know a significant piece or all of the estate has been left to the caregiver. In extreme circumstances relatives are prevented from seeing the loved one. The person dies and this new person receives the entire estate. Can the rest of the family litigate. Sure, but if they don't have a lot of evidence such as copies over the years of other wills proving that there was undue influence while the person had diminished mental capability is nearly impossible. In which states did you work with the attorneys and is the recent experience?
But here is the kicker, it's easy for someone to highjack an inheritance if the person being stolen from never knows how much the person leaving it was supposed to be leaving. Where is the check and balance? If nobody but the lawyer and the person writing the will know how much was really intended how do you prevent the theft from some one who is experiencing true mental decline with a shift in personality (for example) but who doesn't fit the legal definition of not being able to change the documents. What kind of check and balance would you propose to prevent someone from coercing this person into doing something that they would never have done before they started to suffer from mental decline and/or diminished health?
Some of the estate planning attorneys for which I've worked would advise that discretion might be appropriate in some circumstances, but also that family dynamics play a major role, and that openness can avoid suspicion, friction, plotting and disagreements.
It really depends on the attorney. And attorneys who need to boost revenue and get more clients can write books that inflame and influence the public. The attorneys I've worked for write legal manuals but not inflammatory books.
I think that knowing who has responsibility in the event of emergencies is a valid concern. I don't dispute your desire to know that.
I really wonder though how you believe that secrecy increases the likelihood that heirs will not "see" their inheritance and that "plays right into the hands of people looking to steal it."
There's no question that friction can arise between heirs. But theft is a legal term and involves criminal action, so I'm confused how "people" can steal someone else's inheritance just by virtue of the fact that the individual kept his/her intentions private. Could you give me some examples so I can understand your concern?
I will also state that in our person situation there are certain circumstances under which we have decided to withhold information from a potential heir because of the hostility and anger that would create now. There is no reason whatsoever for my father to share this information and be the verbal whipping post for a dissatisfied relative.
As to Pam's comment If you have a chance to read more of Pam's posts, you'll find that she (and Maggie Marshall) can whip off one-liners that really put people in their place. She's not necessarily lying; rather she's using a form of response that avoids a specific answer to a question that doesn't need to be answered, but is also humorously advising that the issue DOESN'T need to be addressed. At least I think that's what she's doing. I've done the same thing in some situations.
I don't believe that full disclosure is advisable under the circumstances any more than she does.
In some states, the Testator may deposit their Last Will and Testament with the Estate's office of the Clerk of Court for safekeeping. They keep them in a vault and it's there when you pass away. The Executor just needs to know this and show up with ID. The county he lives in may or may not confirm if its with them.
However, if that is not the case, you'll have to know where the original Will is stored. Let's hope it's not in a safe deposit box in a bank. You can't get into that without filing something with the court and getting permission.
Ask dad to keep originals of DPOA, HCPOA, LIving Will and Will in the home in a fireproof box or vault. Someone needs to know where it's located. His attorney will keep copies, but probably not much longer than app. 6 years.
What he's expecting you to do is a huge job. People have no idea how stressful and time consuming it is. Good luck.
If you Google "should you be secretive with your estate plans" every lawyer recommends against it. I am the only living offspring and up to a year ago without me ever having prompted him with these discussions he was giving the impression that I would need to step up if something happened. This is someone I spent almost every Christmas with, went on trips with (often paying my own way) etc.. For that matter I was the only family member that regularly visited either one of his houses for years.
From your profile it looks like you grew up in a different generation. The old "turn the other cheek" and "give the benefit of the doubt" no longer applies today. Now if I was asking to be the executor and insisting on control that would be a different situation. All that I care about is that he is of sound mind if the decisions are being made and knowing the truth. I live my life as a open book and have generally found that those who keep secrets do not do it for your benefit. More often than not the betrayal of discovering the deception along with what it uncovers is 10 times worse than if the person had just been honest to begin with.
If you re-read my initial question, you will see that I'm trying to figure out who to call if something happens. The way I look at it if you can't share that with your family then you really don't have much regard for them if you are doing that and are of sound mind. But beyond that, from everything I have read being secretive with your estate plans exponentially increases the chance that your intended heirs will never see it and plays right into the hands of people looking to steal it.
But the thing that really perplexes me is why you felt the need to lie to your MIL. Why not just say I don't need your money without the lie. Personally I have found it a lot easier to tell the truth so that I don't have to remember who I told what lie to and as a side benefit the person is more likely to trust me because I don't lie.
But hey, perhaps I have a different set of Values....
GardenArtist -- In all honesty I would rather have the truth now. To me that is much more important.
If he does everything in sound mind then he can and should do whatever he wants to do. If he's not and his wishes were different, well that is a different story. If he is of sound mind I also don't want the inheritance to be held over my head. I'm not for sale, though there are a lot of my family members are.
Second, after death the Will is in force and the Executor is in charge.
Third, as an old person myself, I don't want my family bugging me for all the darn details, because it opens up a can of worms. So stop asking him. Show a little respect.
Since your father is being reluctant to discuss the appointments he's made, Ii suspect he chose someone other than you and doesn't want to embarrass you.
If no one in the family is aware of the selected person, it may even be his attorney, or someone else outside the family.
Some states apparently require some POAs (Durable, specifically) to be recorded. You might check the county in which your father lives to find out if any DPOA was recorded.
As far as his mental capacity, we have not seen anything up to this point to indicate that his financial affairs or legal matters are not being kept in order. We have however started to see some things that would indicate cognitive decline...things like telling the same story day after day not remembering he told you the story the previous day. Forgetting about telling you about significant events a few months prior even though you talked to him multiple times before etc..
The problem is that we know what we have seen, but we have no family support on this. One family member is too far in denial, another after as much of the estate as they can get their hands on and are denying it while trying to take advantage of the situation etc.. The rest do not talk with him enough to be able to notice anything at this point.
The challenge is that we are seeing things that might be cognitive decline, but he refuses to go to the doctor for anything, is not compliant with doctors orders and we are not professionals. There appear to be some signs, and some of the behavior seems more pronounced than in times past but it's not pronounced enough where I can say with 100% certainty that this is mental decline.