My wife set up five CD's, each with her Mom's name and a siblings name on the
CD, equal amounts of money five years ago. All the CD's came due and four of the siblings transferred the money into a trust being set up for my mother-in law by my wife. One sibling kept the money and refuses to give the money back. This will show up on the five year look back if she ever needs Medicaid. We can't seem to convince this sibling of this fact and to return the money. Any suggestions?
I spent 10 years with an alcoholic (who I fortunately never married) and learned that when you're dealing w/addicts, it's all about them all the time. You cannot reason w/such people, and they'll only "care" if you all ostracize them when they need something the next time from one of you.
In the other hand, what goes around comes around.
Sorry for your troubles!
The only other possibility is if the sibling eventually becomes ostracized from the other siblings and family members, alienated from the family, and decides to return the funds as a peace offering. Or, if what the sibling lost by being disinherited was greater than the funds received from the matured CD he/she might reconsider.
I'm not an attorney though, so there may be some other legal methods available, but I think the issue really turns on the fact that the CDs were titled MIL OR sibling.
As for Medicaid, if she needs it within five years of the misappropriation, there will be a penalty. I doubt you can do a thing about it.
I can't imagine why you set it up that way, frankly. In a divorce or a lawsuit involving one of your siblings? Your mom's money could easily have been attached.
I would have suggested the issue be addressed in the trust, but since it's for your MIL, I suspect that one of the siblings just didn't want to contribute but wanted the money for him or herself.
Will there be any provisions in the trust naming the siblings as heirs? If so, that sibling's share can be addressed and stated to be less by the amount of the CD, plus accumulated interest based on how the other CDs are invested under the trust.
So the sibling just gets less if he/she is an heir or beneficiary under the trust. If they're not heirs or beneficiaries, I'm not sure how you could get the funds back if the sibling isn't cooperating, but I still don't understand how one of two people named jointly can retain the funds w/o your MIL's consent. Perhaps you could explain, or perhaps I'm misunderstanding the situation?