He recently moved from Florida to Texas and is living in a nursing facility in TX. I'm trying to change Medicaid from FL to TX but facility is saying he has too much money (although he has nothing but a car worth $1.5K that's paid for, life insurance policy that I'm paying for and a bank account of $2K). Why am I cashing in a policy that's in his name but I'm paying for it?
Your take on deciding who "deserves" being taken care of by the taxpayers is insightful and food for thought. Your point is well-taken. However, there is a fine line between "deserving" and "earning," which was my point in mentioning that my mom had "worked and paid taxes her whole life." While she never had enough money to set aside for her own retirement, she didn't feed at the public trough - but instead spent 50 years faithfully contributing to the welfare of others with her own tax dollars. I don't typically have a lot of patience with the deadbeats and leeches that are too lazy to work and can't be bothered preparing themselves financially, but I feel that to some degree, my mother HAS "earned" some consideration in return for the years of support she gave to others. Just sayin'...It's a moral argument in my mind (as opposed to LEGAL). Whether she "deserves" such support is another matter entirely...
If you feel that taxes are being misspent, then consider for a moment that unbelievable mess Iraq War, no bid contracts, etc. Don't blame working people, blame the people at the top, the greedy ones, Wall Street and their paid thugs in the Republican party.
Would a better system involve judging whether the child who eats the food bought with food stamps is more or less deserving of tax dollars than someone who "worked and paid taxes his whole life" but, for whatever reason, finds himself with very little money and needing expensive care in his old age?
Does it change the equation if the 'hard working' man gambled and drank away all the money he could have saved for retirement. Or if the child's parent is an unmarried drug addict or a struggling minimum wage worker? Who decides? A social worker, a judge? Some people seem to feel that they (or their parents) do 'deserve' the benefits and others, because of their employment status or perceived laziness, do not.
The programs exist for those who are in the circumstances determined to qualify for them.
No one is able to look into the heart and soul of any individual and judge whether they are deserving of mercy and charity. In our civilized society, we choose to not simply step over the bodies of the poor in the street, whether those bodies be of saints or sinners, they get help when they need it, simply because they need it.
You can use some of the money to pre-pay his funeral expenses. Everything else goes toward his care at the facility. If you want to keep the life insurance money, bring your father home & take care of him yourself/
I completely understand how you feel. My parents were never able to provide for me and I managed for myself since I was VERY young. Many years later in life, I ended up caring for my mother's every need in my home for 10 years prior to her nursing home admission (KY). Just as I've done all of my life, this was done without any public or private assistance. However, I had to mollify my husband with the idea that "one day we will recoup at least a fraction of these expenses from her insurance policy," assuming there would be any left after the funeral. Now that won't be the case. I had to designate my Mom's whole-life as a "burial policy," and sign the entire proceeds irrevocably to the funeral home before she could qualify for Medicaid. She only gets to keep $40 of her SS money for her personal needs, so I end up paying the $72 per month in premiums, plus $100 for DEPENDS because she cannot manage the tape-on style of incontinence garments the nursing home provides. There are other odds and ends, so our fixed income takes a $200 monthly hit that we did not anticipate.
I don't mind missing out on any “inheritance” proceeds, nor do I have a problem helping provide for my mother - what I DO mind is dipping into my husband's carefully saved retirement to get it. The conflict is gut-wrenching; so at the age of 62, I'm having to go job-hunting again. With the taxes I still pay, and my mother having been a gainfully employed taxpayer in her own right for 50 years or more before her illness, all of this has been a bitter pill to swallow, discovering that she did not merit any better than she's getting. I've had to take a step back and adjust my thinking about this matter in recent months, and as soon as I can eliminate the need to "Rob Peter to Pay Paul," I will feel a whole lot better. People need to know that planning for your own retirement is not (and has NEVER been) enough. Wish you the best of luck in the trauma of dealing with bureaucracy. It’s never easy.
Good luck.
For Medicare, 3 months before you turn 65 you enroll in it. It is a general entitlement. It pays for physician services, hospitalization, rehab, PT & OT, drugs, etc at preset rates paid to participating vendors & often with a co-pay. Medicare coverage is based on groups from Part A - Part D. Part A almost always is covered by FICA; if you are unfortunate enough not to have Part A coverage, it is $ 407 a month for Part A. Part B everybody pays & from $ 105 - 336 a month; most pay $ 147. $ 147 a month is really cheap for guaranteed health insurance. There is no way private health insurance companies are going to provide coverage for folks in their 80's or 90's ever for $ 147 a month, not gonna happen. Part C & Part D all vary in cost depending on what programs exist in your state & what you need. You have control over what programs to sign up for in Part C & Part D - if your costs are high, you should look to see if another C or D program is better & lower in cost. When you're working premiums get paid via FICA. When you retire & have SS for income, premium is deducted from SS.
For SS, that is an entitlement based on what you pay into. So high income in wages & taxes, are going to get more in SS than someone who worked for a low wage or worked off the grid. SS is a income based entitlement.
Most of the US pays into Medicare & SS via FICA, but some folks are outside of the system - like RailRoad retirement. If you work in the US, FICA is done & you really don't have an opt-out but therefore you qualify to get Medicare & SS.
Medicaid is entirely different & totally a needs-based entitlement and has to be applied for & to a specific program. You choose to apply for Medicaid. For NH Medicaid, they have to show the need financially (impoverished) & medically for skilled nursing care. Usually there is no co-pay for medical. Medicaid requires a SOC/share of cost for non-medical - that is why once they go into a NH on Medicaid, they have to do a co-pay of their monthly income to the NH. NH Medicaid also requires a recovery of costs if assets become nonexempt. That is why when they die, MERP can place a claim or a lien on the house, as once they die the exemption goes away.
For Medicaid NH eligibility, either you plan years & years ahead for a need that may not happen OR you have to spend-down to be impoverished OR you're already poor. It is not a perfect system, but really if your elder lives long enough, they will end up needing care and eventually will run out of money, and thank goodness that Medicare, SS and Medicaid is available for them. With the cost of health care in the US and the on-coming tsunami of baby boomers needing care, there probably won't be Medicaid like what there is now in the future for us - it will be too expensive to maintain.
NH run from 5K - 15K a month so the costs for Medicaid are huge compared to other needs-based programs. The other needs based programs - like SNAP or TANF or WIC - are term limited services.There always are abuses to the programs but probably not near what media presents - most on Section 8 are working poor. I think the average cost for a mom on WIC is like $ 500 a mo post. Compare that to $ 4,495 a month for room & board for grandma in a TX NH. The new mom is going off WIC within 6 months or a year; but grandma may be in a NH for years. Costs for elderly on Medicaid are just staggering.
My sister was a low functioning Down's Syndrome adult when she went onto state aid. She worked a job for pennies and when she saved enough, she had to "spend down". With the help of my mother, she purchased bedroom furniture, clothing, personal items, etc. When she was 49 she was diagnosed with Leukemia. We only knew for 5 days before she passed away. (a blessing, actually) However, 2 days before she died, "the very nice and concerned people from the Medicaid office" came in to "discuss" her funeral arrangements. My husband threw them out. We asked for privacy and did not feel that was the time or place. Once she passed, my mother was given a call and said she was not allowed in my sister's bedroom (she was living with another family) without a Medicaid official in the room and then that was only to pick out clothing for her burial. While we were at the funeral, they cataloged every item in her room and determined a "price" for everything. If we wanted anything from my sister's possessions, we had to buy them at the price the office decided.
I have not looked at this as if they were taking my inheritance. It was not my money. I have been able to make sure my father has been looked after for 4 years since my mother's death. I have never expected anything from him. I do not resent that I have had to spend everything in order to get help. I resent what they did to my sister and I resent the hoops and the 5 year look back while undeserving people seem to get welfare with no problem. This has taken me weeks to get the information they are looking for and I still do not know if he will be approved.
Like 'pinky1', I also bristle when I hear complaints about "the State" taking a parent's assets to pay for care. Medicaid is an entitlement program (like food stamps or Section 8 vouchers). Its purpose is to pay for care for those who cannot pay themselves. If you have assets, you must first use them to pay for your care, then "the State" will pay. The popular notion that the State "takes your money" is inaccurate. The State acts as a middle man so that care can be started immediately. They begin paying the nursing home for you while you sell any assets that are not liquid, then they recover that money from you. Would you rather the alternative...you're discharged from the hospital needing skilled nursing care and you sit at the curb while your house is sold or your insurance policy is cashed in!
That said, many states allow certain expenses to be paid from assets before the money must go towards nursing care. Often, you can pre-pay for the funeral. It's unfortunate that many don't know this and wind up footing the bill themselves when it could have been paid. Even for someone with minimal assets, it is so worth sitting down with an lawyer, just to get some good advice. I spend only $200 for an hour with a qualified elder law attorney and she steered me clear of what would have been a very expensive mistake. Get all your paperwork and questions together and make an appointment.
If he is a beneficiary on anything and that person dies he can be disqualified for Medicaid after the fact.
I found grist of this disclaimer on TechByter Worldwide. {adapted for my postings}
Regarding my posts: I participate and post for informational purposes only. I assume no responsibility for accuracy. Any actions you take based on my posting information are entirely at your own risk. Products and services are mentioned for informational purposes only and their various trademarks and service marks are the property of their respective owners. I am an independent un-paid aggregator; I collect information from various Internet sources share it thru Dave Mainwaring’s Knowledge Network
Good idea to check all of this out.
Carol