9 yrs ago husband's brother offered to move in with their parents to provide care. Mom (at 77) had just been diagnosed w/dementia, Dad was 80. Dad recently died, and two of the siblings are now privately complaining that the live-in caregiver's lifestyle was being "subsidized" by the rest of the family, because he received food, lodging, and use of a vehicle over these 9 years. Mind you, this was not a lavish lifestyle -- their home is in a remote, rural area, and their daily life was simple and basic. In addition to doing all their shopping, cooking, cleaning, and chauffeuring, my brother-in-law helped them maintain the property, including planting and tending the large garden his dad insisted on having, and then canning what was left over. As their health declined, he took on more and more responsibility with overnight wandering, incontinence, bathing, and feeding. He was never paid for any of this, and never asked to be paid for it. He was surprised to learn that Dad made him the beneficiary of a $10K life insurance policy, with no explanation. We feel he more than earned it by literally putting his life on hold for 9 years. The two sibs think he "owes" the family, because (in their opinion) what he received from his living arrangements far exceeded what he did for them. I calculated that a 24-hour live-in caregiver @ 4 days a week making a meager $5/hour, for 50 weeks a year over 9 years would have made more than $200,000. That also doesn't consider the quality of care, availability of suitable care in such a remote area, reliability and continuity of having a loving, dedicated caregiver. We are dumbfounded and think the sibs are delusional and mean-spirited. What do you think?
Oh and by the way in a facility it is $335 a day for 24/7 care one person,and after 9 years all assets and life insurance and anything they owned would have been gone long time ago and someone would have had to pay the remainder fees. Figure out that bill and ask those complaining who did who a favor.
Carol
Your husband's brother helped the parents at an age when people start losing their mental and physical abilities. The fact that the father set up that insurance policy says it all.
However, status-wise, family male caregiver is just about at the bottom of the totem pole and leaves HB vulnerable to charges like "he wasn't working" or was being "subsidized".
Do you think the 2 complainers be willing to go back in time and take on his role instead?
Anyway the sibs don't understand that it is very easy to be objective about this matter. In Economics 101, one of the frist ideas presented is "opportunity cost". IOW, what would be the value of some income-producing activity that your HB could have been engaged in for 9 years?
As I suggested, family male caregiver leaves HB open to charges of being unemployable or "worthless" if the attackers are so inclined. HB could counter with, "I coulda been a contender..." in some job or career. But even that is not necessary.
In Canada there is a severe shortage of caregivers, and they actually have an official program to bring in workers from other countries - most the Phillipines and India, as I understand it. They are guaranteed to make minimum wage (7.25 - 10.00 or so, based on the province) and the government stipulates how much of their wages are to be deducted for room and board. It works out to about $375 monthly. (Google Canada caregiver program) They also get overtime, holiday pay, ect.
So we see that even at a rock-bottom exploited-foreign-labor rate, your HB would have been able to bank $10,000 per year.
The sibs are nuts.
Ahhh, gratitude. What a completely foreign idea anymore.
Going through a birth canal is no guarantee of anything other than going through a birth canal. Maybe they need reminded of that. If I were your HB I would print up a couple tickets that entitle the barer the chance to stand in line to feel resented and hand them out the next family reunion.
Blessing for stepping up and supporting him.
Blessings,
Bridget
But they are also being extremely nosy because the bottom line is, what happened between his parents and himself all those hard and scary years is none of thier freaking business.
I'm glad you're concerned that they keep it to themselves because it would be very painful for him to have his love and caring treated so callously and crudely as to be argued in terms of an hourly wage.
Thank you for standing up for him.
We on the "front lines" are disgusted--when we have time, that is--with the "wicked step-sister" attitude when we are doing all the work. I hope you print out all of our responses here and Nail them--I mean mail them-- to the wicked siblings... and they can mow my grass-- as soon as it stops raining.
How dare anyone undervalue the hell we have gone through in the care of another!!!!!!
May they reap what they sow!!!!!!!