Original will was between my mom & dad in the 1960's. I have taken care of her ever since my dad passed in the 1980's. She did not drive & would not have been able to live in their home in the country w/o me. 16 yrs ago she would entered a nursing home after a stroke if I was not there to take care of her. 5 yrs ago she needed 24/7 care. I was never paid for any thing I did. She had a new will made out naming me as only beneficiary and explaining why. My only sibling is contesting & according to ever attorney I spoke to, the new will is invalid because the other one was a contract.
Do I have a case? My mom could have received help from the state & I could have been paid as a care provider but my mom did not want to do that. She wanted me to be able to live in the home as long as I wanted to & the property to stay in the family.
Thank you
@rainmom - I never intended to offend you & I actually thought I was being sympathetic when I said what I did about your dad.
I've only had one attorney agree with me. He is not an estate attorney but there is one in his law office. All the other ones I spoke to gave me their opinion - the old will would take precedence, but would not explain why or how they came to that conclusion.
Thanks for the advice. I was looking for estate & trial attorney. Contract law makes sense.
grandson
The end
"The terms of the wills require that the after the death of either of them, the residue of probate assets is to be devised and bequeathed to the surviving spouse, and upon the death of the surviving spouse, the residue of the surviving spouse’s estate is to be devised and bequeathed to their sons."
NO sons -- that is copied and pasted from a link. Go back and read my first answer. I also mentioned in another post to rainmom. I'm sorry it was not clear - I thought it was.
As for "But I feel obligated to uphold my dads wishes" -- I think if your dad could see you now, he would change his mind. Like you said, circumstances change. I also agree with you - I don't know why people think everything has to be equal.
Thank you & take care
My first wish is for her current will to be valid but the law is what it is. I also stated that. If wishes were .....
I don't understand the anti lapse statue which I also said.
My original question, before people started asking me about the contract will was in regards to being compensated . Does anyone have any experience to share or any knowledge. One attorney said 50/50. Depends on the judge.
There is only one sentence that makes the will contractual. There is no additional contract, no special wording stating that it can not be revoked by either party & there is no mention in the will in regards to my bro or I inheriting anything unless our parents die at the same time. The issue with the will is the anti-lapse statue.
I'm sorry if you were confused. My parents are not Norma Jean & royal - check the link for yourself
Please refer to my very first answer. I posted the sentence in the will which makes it a "contract" . It's in quotation marks. I added the asterisks. I'll even copy it and paste it again.
Here is the wording "This being a Joint will, the same is *binding* on each of us and our successors, and the consideration for the making of this will is the promise and the execution of this will to the other. "
Contract wills are very common in 2nd marriages also but they usually contain more language & often times I signed contract is attached stating neither party will change their will.
You have a right to your opinion but I don't think my Dad would have wanted my mom to stay all by herself out in the country for next 30 years of her life. She did not drive & was scared to be home alone at night. If it was possible for him to see her, he would be *surprised* to have found her living there. He would not have cared in the least if she sold and moved and/or spent the money on whatever. He wasn't a control freak. He wanted her to have the best life. Had she sold she would not have had to struggle financially. I'm speaking poverty level. I'm sorry my response offended you but you didn't know them.
However, I think the issue of the post goes beyond that and seeks more compensation for caregiving than for equal asset distribution.
There's a lot of analysis that could be done, but I think this is the jist of the heir issue:
"The terms of the wills require that the after the death of either of them, the residue of probate assets is to be devised and bequeathed to the surviving spouse, and upon the death of the surviving spouse, the residue of the surviving spouse’s estate is to be devised and bequeathed to their sons."
Using standard contractual language, anything to the contrary notwithstanding, this clause seems to disinherit you entirely. The only consideration might be that you weren't born when that will was made.
It does state "sons" - are there additional brothers involved even if they aren't contesting the subsequent Will?
I took a quick look at the statutory citations, but I wouldn't feel comfortable commenting other than on a cursory basis. Based on some of the language, I think this is something that needs to be researched by an experienced Iowa attorney.
However, this is one of the strangest wills I've seen; there were definitely some things desired to be accomplished at the time, but I suspect you'll never know what your parents' intents were.
I would think, briefly and w/o going into a more in depth analysis, that if you wanted to challenge the will, and if you still seek an opinion from a qualified attorney, you need one who's familiar not only with estate planning but with contractual law and contractual challenges....someone from a well qualified, firm with very, very experienced attorneys. This isn't a matter for a solo practitioner of elder law - it's not necessarily even elder law.
It is unfortunate that there are these conflicts after your mother's death. I do think though that when she executed the new Will after your father's death, she was in fact breaking if not challenging the terms of the original Will. It's also unfortunate that such a provision was ever included - it's very binding.
I don't see how it applies
https://coolice.legis.iowa.gov/Cool-ICE/default.asp?category=billinfo&service=IowaCode&ga=83&input=633.273
https://www.calt.iastate.edu/article/iowa-anti-lapse-statute-construed
Is there anyone familiar with this ? Any attorneys or law student or anyone who knows contract law ?