My Mom has mild to medium dementia - depending on the day. She is on Galantamine and Memantine which was prescribed by her primary care physician. Should I get a screening from a neurologist? Are different drugs prescribed for different kinds of dementia? Or should I just leave it alone?
My mom passed away in April from congestive heart failure, and I regret the pressure I felt and put on her to know what was wrong, i.e. the dementia. Looking back, I think it would have saved a lot of tension if I had just met alone with her doctor to get advice on what it could possibly be and how to help her adjust to her new "normal." But this is a personal decision. There are meds for Alzheimer's that work at the beginning stages, only to slow down the progress. So that would be something to discuss with a doctor also. Please know I'll be praying for you and your mom. It seems like a lonely journey, but everyone on here has either gone through this or is going through this now and can offer support and definitely relate to what you are facing.
As Teri4077 also eluded to the test can be a scary prospect, my mom really resisted the second one in particular. I think because she knew it was being used as a guide to some big decisions like when she could go back to living on her own at her house and if she could think about driving again by her medical team. It's also a long and grueling test for some (mom with her aphasia) and I think makes difficulties with certain basics, things it never occurred to her she had difficulties with, very obvious to the person taking the test. It can expose things to the person taking the test that might feel really scary I think. But also as Teri said the experience can be swayed quite a bit by the testers personality and abilities. My mom loved the first tester in particular as well!
This means that when they are going into care you know all issues & can effect your choice because moving at a later stage can be harmful to their orientation as they don't accept change well
You don't say where you are - is getting a neurologist going to be financially hard? - maybe try a gerentologist - good luck
People in their mid-80s do not necessarily want to live for ever, but they do want to be comfortable. So if they are in a heavily structured environment like assisted living, where they don't have to worry where the next meal comes from, nor bills to pay, and there's always somebody to ask if they have a problem, then they can live quite happily at a superficial level. Knowing the exact date matters very little in this context, so old people often don't bother.
I would speculate that your mother has very mild form of Alzheimer's but that her brain has reprogrammed itself a bit to be able to handle the ipad.
So there's your answer: a neurologist, not a general practitioner, is the only person who can diagnose the present state of your mother's brain and say if it's Alzheimer's or another clear form of dementia requiring a different level of personal care. They will also know the latest treatments. True Alz patients have many periods of complete lucidity, and hate being treated like morons when they are perfectly capable of rational conversations. But such patients may desperately need anxiety-depressors to get them through the first stages until they reach acceptance that their mental state will never improve but only get worse.
Good diets are fine to halt a disease's progression but I have yet to find a food diet that wil replace lost useful brain tissue.
And dementia may cover up other serious medical conditions (eg urinary tract infection). Dementia patients are not medically articulate. Alzheimer's patients may struggle to articulate due to their memory lapses and they expect a doctor to diagnose them by thought transfer!! . My friend had a prolapsed anus, but because she was too shy to tell anybody about "the trouble with her bottom" and because she was paralysed with fright during a consultant with a specialist doctor, (I was not there) and even refusing an examination, she suffered for several more weeks before I dragged her to a clinic we knew and insisted on a thorough health check up. The problem was identified, surgery booked and done. It had to be redone more thoroughly 3 years later but this time at least we were on the lookout.
The book 'Brain Grain' is an incredible understanding of how to prevent ALZ. It is too late for my Mom as she is 96 with a long history of non-appropriate eating and in mid to advanced ALZ, but it is not too late for many of us; and it may not be too late for an ALZ patient who is only in the mild stage. It is a great breakthrough. I DO suggest everyone gets that book and begins to make changes in their diet according to their ability.
Does it matter during the course of their lives?...maybe.
A person with Lewy Body Dementia can not take certain types of medications. But Lewy Body is usually in people with Parkinson's so if she does not have Parkinson's It probably doesn't matter.
Vascular Dementia on the other hand is different. The Dementia is worsened by small strokes. And at some point there may be a major stroke that you may have to deal with. Either the person (and caregiver) is lucky enough to not survive or unlucky enough that it is one that they do survive and are left with not just the result of more decline but more physical problems as well.
The "normal" decline of one with Alzheimer's is a slow and steady decline. (Like walking down a ramp)
The "normal" decline of someone with vascular dementia is sudden drops. (Like walking down stairs.)
My Husband never got an "accurate" diagnosis and I think he had both Alzheimer's and Vascular Dementia's. His decline was slow and steady like walking down a ramp with sudden steep declines just like he came to a landing on the ramp that forced him to take a step down to another ramp of decline.
Did not knowing make a difference? Not really. I would not have changed what I did and it would not have changed the ultimate outcome.
So the ultimate person to answer this is you and you knowing your Mom.
Can she withstand the testing?
Can she cooperate during the testing?
Will she have to be sedated during any of the testing and how will she react to the sedation?
Is she otherwise healthy?
Have you discussed the outcome of any testing and whatever it may uncover?
If she has Alzheimer's or other form of dementia and problems are discovered during any testing what will you do with the results? (example: during a full physical the doctor suggests a colonoscopy? would you elect to do it? If you do it and the results show cancer will you elect to treat or not?)
Do you/she have a P.O.L.S.T. (used to be a DNR) in place? A P.O.L.S.T. is more detailed than a DNR
All very tough discussions but these are conversations that are best had as early as possible or you will be left making the call.
And if you have siblings they need to be kept in the loop and be made aware of decisions that your Mom makes.
We never did know what kind of dementia our mother had. By observing the symptoms I would say it was not ALZ, and I'm definitely sure it wasn't LBD. It might have satisfied my curiosity to know, but I doubt it would have made any difference at all in my mother's care.
If it were easy to get a differentiated diagnosis, why not? But it is not easy, not inexpensive, not highly accurate. I don't think that putting my mother through more tests, interviews, etc. would have been worth the effort for her. As diagnostic techniques become refined, and as effective treatments become available, this will all change.
For now, the biggest benefit is probably for the caregiver.
You probably could have saved Mom from a diagnosis that would have led to many medications, that (in some people's opinions), would have led to a more rapid deterioration. I think for you, and for your Mom, you did good, really good!
Would it be useful to know what kind of dementia your mother has? At this point it would be useful to science if she were enrolled in a study. It MIGHT be useful in coming up with a treatment plan or in understanding her symptoms. But we know so little about how to treat the various kinds of dementia that being able to differentiate among them may not be as valuable as we wish. This will change as research progresses, but right now even if you knew that mother had XYZ type dementia, there aren't likely to be any specific treatments for XYZ in any case.
There are very few biomarkers that allow for diagnoses of type of dementia in non-intrusive ways. Autopsy is often the only way of identifying what was going on in the brain. While that is very useful for research, it is of no practical value to the patient or family. (My husband donated his brain for this kind of research.)
Here is an important consideration: The different kinds of dementia have different symptoms and progress in different ways. Even within the same kind of dementia, individual cases vary a lot. So if the care center or day care program or hospital staff -- anyone who deals with a "dementia" patient expects all patients to match some predefined "typical" case, that will be a problem. But if they are better educated and flexible in their approach then the exact diagnosis isn't so important.
Case in point: A nursing home staff was sure a resident was being manipulative and "faking" symptoms, because they seemed to come and go. Something he could do in the morning he claimed he couldn't do in the afternoon. None of their other dementia patients had this much and this frequent variation. But that is a core identifying feature of Lewy Body Dementia (which is what he had). So in a way it would be good to identify what type of dementia people have. But for now it would be cheaper and more convenient to simply treat each person as a unique individual and deal with the symptoms they have, without regard to some supposed "typical" dementia pattern.