Bills are paid automatically, so we don't know where the money ($1000-1500/mo) is going. Mom has dementia, FIL is right behind her, beginning stages. My husband has financial POA but Elder Care attorney says that without going to court for conservatorship, we can't control their spending. How is this going to affect the spend down when she needs Medicaid? She is 91, he is 89. He may be sending cash in mail to various "charities" and for supplements such as "stem cells" which are totally take but we can't convince him to stop.
Presently, I'm dealing with my both my in-laws. We've found $8,000.00 plus IRS tax refunds not cashed.
This option will frustrate them and make them angry, but isn't it better than them being broke???
As their financial POA, your husband must prevent them from squandering their liquid assets. It's also important for their dignity to give them an "allowance".
Losing and misusing money is part of the disease we broadly call dementia. Therefore, limiting the amount of money they can lose or misuse is a way to limit your and your husband's frustrations with their unwise and irrational behavior.
Would a conversation with an estate planning lawyer be helpful?
please please asap go thru whatever paperwork on these, especially if they are actually getting real bullion or “collectible” coins or “shares on paper”. Really silver as investments tend to be scams. The hook that is used is is “silver paid $50 oz in the past & it’s coming back” nonsense as your parents are old enough to remember the Hunt Brothers & the silver rush that they missed out on....... Yeah in like 1980. And back then I wore a size 4-6 and those days are not, NOT, coming back.
Silver is like maybe $15 and that’s kinda spot price for certified bars (these babies are weight stamped & have some sort of paperwork as to provenance as where mined - like 5 oz. Perth) for quite a while. There is / was a big scam going on with silver, where you buy a collectible silver coin for $100. But coin wasn’t a true rare or precious worth $100 on open market. It actually has a melt value or spot price of $45 -$55. Literally you loose half of your $ immediately.
Theres a whole series on the silver scam just this last Nov & Dec in Quartz by Jeremy Merrill entitled “Mining for Silver”. The scammers prospect & use Facebook and conservative talk radio. Lisa Rowan also has written on this in different financial advice columns for other publications (she has great & often hilarious podcasts too).
really if your folks are getting silver scammed, their info is being sold and they are going to be approached on other even more dubious “investments”. They are gonna get fleeced. Please please try to get over soon to clearly review what exactly it is that they are buying. There are legitimate ways to invest in rare coins & precious metals (1 of the best companies worldwide is in my city) but these are going to be $ 25k, 50k $$$+ coins with provenance. Not $1,000 buys. Not sending cash or money orders in the mail to buy stuff.
I sympathize with your other problems of not all siblings "being on board" for guardianship and possible future Medicaid disallowance. If a formalized family meeting to discuss these issues hasn't already happened, then I suggest doing that ASAP. And use a professional mediator if it is at all likely that such a meeting will quickly become an accusatory shouting match and/or a passive-aggressive chess match. Also investigate your state's Medicaid rules and practices. In my case, two of us thoroughly investigated Medicaid practices and both of us asked for family meetings with the other six. but there were no positive responses. So, I went ahead and did what was best for my dad. Best wishes in navigating this hard time.
In cases where an elder's finances are minimal and a single bank account can be restricted, it may be possible to manage an elder's decline in capacity with a POA document.
But you are describing a case where the work involved with gaining Probate Conservatorship can save your parents and your family from much greater stress in the future. Conservatorship is the only way you can compel third party financial institutions to comply with restrictions needed to stop the drain of funds to financial predators.
Beyond the tragedy of lost resources that could have been used for care, the end game if Medicaid eligibility becomes necessary involves a severe accounting nightmare. A Medicaid application will require you to explain the transfers of drained funds.
Chaos during the 5 year look back period makes the Medicaid Application preparation 100x more burdensome than if a Conservator starts right now with the tasks of managing and accounting for your parents' life savings.
His parents have given him POA. This means that they have trusted him to manage their affairs in the future, when they no longer can. He can explain to his father that without information about their finances, including who is receiving their money, he cannot do the job they have appointed him to do.
His father is more likely to be open with him about where the money's going if your husband doesn't argue with him about his choices.
Folks who are competent can make their own stupid decisions. That does not, however, obligate their children to rescue them from their poor decisions after the fact.
If the current laws permit elders to be taken advantage of financially, I don't see how the government [aka Medicaid] can then deny funding for care just because they've lost money to swindlers.
You mentioned church. Do you think they are donating to the church? Some churches ask for lots of money.
The sibling issue is the bigger problem, and maybe the only way would be guardianship. This could become a nightmare, both for time and expense, esp if parents or siblings contest it. If there is any way around this, it would be better!
"Elder Care attorney says that without going to court for conservatorship, we can't control their spending."
The "expert" who chimed in seemed to back up your attorney's statements. I am confused about this though. DPOA becomes "effective" the minute it's signed and gives one the authority to make financial decisions. Curbing spending maybe isn't part of that, but restricting access to funds could stop the drain. With DPOA you should be able to move the funds to a "safe" place, without taking the money to your account, in their own acct or trust.
When my mother was making mistakes (no excess spending, just mistakes), I stepped in and took over. We had DPOA and she added me and YB to her CU acct long before this. However, she had opened an acct in a closer bank, and had SS deposited there, for easier access to cash when she wanted/needed it. I was NOT on the acct and did no business with them, so they didn't know me. I had SS redirected to the CU acct and once verified, I took her to the bank with DPOA and withdrew all the funds via check and closed the acct, then deposit it in her CU acct. She did/said nothing other than rifle through her wallet/purse, both at CU and bank. I have read others' say banks refused to honor POAs, but in our case I got no flak. Meanwhile we had the EC atty revise/update so we could protect her home and assets (trusts.) As her CDs matured, I transferred the funds to my acct and then deposited these into the trust acct (EC said this was okay as I was "disabled." Bank/CU didn't know that! Not sure how that works, but...) No one ever gave me grief.
I had to sign up as SS rep payee, to change the address for paperwork (can't forward federal mail and federal entities DON'T honor any POAs.) It was worse getting to be her rep for the pension as it is federal, but eventually the right words were written up by the doc - funds still go to the primary acct, but I manage it all from there and can work with pension people for changes.
IF they have excess funds (savings, etc.), can you not move those to a sub-acct or lock them into CDs? DPOA should allow that. See EC atty and set up a trust for these funds? Their regular income will have to be addressed differently. You could try the SS route (call local office, not the 800#, unless you enjoy being on hold!) for their SS income. If approved, it goes to you as rep payee and each has a special acct only you can access. It requires yearly reporting, but can be done online (keep good receipts/accounting.) Other income would have to be taken care of as well, leaving them "enough" to have money for "extras", but not enough to blow on these probable scams or carry around with them.
Curious to know if you can figure out who their "contact" is for the silver - hopefully not one of the resistant siblings...
If all else fails, then guardianship will be the answer. If they continue to blow through their savings/income, with no legit paper trail, it could prevent them getting Medicaid, if/when they might need it!
I would meet with the EC atty (or another, might get free initial consult) and discuss the issues and what can/can't be done. Having more or less taken over their acct(s), I don't understand why it's so hard to move assets to a sub-acct or CD to prevent access. A trust set up (you and another trusted person as trustees) would be best and less expensive and time-consuming than going to court (consider house trust as well.) If you can get approval to be rep for any pensions, redirect enough of the funds to another sub-acct for them, leaving them "spending" money, and protect the rest.
Hope you find the simplest solution!
First, get ur inlaws evaluated. If they are found incompetent, than ur husband can take over. As POA the siblings really have no say. He can keep them in the loop but parents assigned him. You can then take their checkbook out of the house. My uncle was able to put him down as the only signer on my Gma's account. (Family member was forging checks) Maybe DH can do something like that.
Conservatorship may cost money. I think Medicaid allows the use of ur parents money to set it up. Check with ur lawyer.
The second issue is that they don't use checks. All payments OP has set up and parents stopped using checks. They are withdrawing these large sums of money, therefore there will be no paper trail and no way to prove how it was spent or if it was given to the children - big issue if Medicaid is ever needed!
Agree that if OP is the only DPOA, siblings input/complaints are moot, however, they could, if they were wise enough, apply for guardianship themselves, which would override the DPOA. This would have to be contested if OP feels they are not qualified or suspects they might abuse this duty (one wants to move "closer" and get paid to care for the parents... iffy...) If anyone contests (parents can too), it will take longer and cost a LOT more as everyone gets their own atty, and generally the funds are paid from the parents' assets (if they are denied guardianship, they'd likely have to pay for their own atty, but I can't say for sure how all that works!)
If there is no way to determine where this money is going AND the bank/EC atty keeps blocking OP from doing his DPOA job, it might be best to suck it up and file for guardianship.
My sister an I are more worried about fraud and her being swindled out of large sums of money than her having 100 rolls of toilet paper on hand, a dresser full of supplements and some cash hidden in her bottom drawer. She understands the need for us to know the location.
Keep a stockpile of “openers” in your head - to get Mom & Dad to open up about who they see and who they interact with.
Who bought the Jones’ house at the end of the street? Who do you trust to service your car, now that Bob’s Garage is closed? Is XXX’s niece still a cashier at Walmart? Muse that you see (or don’t see) a lot of families with young kids in your parents’ neighborhood now. Ask your parents who cleans their gutters, who mows their lawn, etc (act like you want a recommendation for someone).
Every time you see Mom & Dad, make sure that some aspect of your conversation spurs them to reveal something about their little world.
If Mom or Dad mentions a “nice single mom” or “fella who’s down on his luck,” pay special attention.
Really to paraphrase, “it takes a village to keep an elder in their home”. And you just must to try to know to some degree who all are part of your folks village. Especially important if you do not actually live in the same city (or state!). If that means you get onto the Next Door app or you join their neighbor association, you do it; and you actually go with them to their weekly lunch/ dinner/ novena/shabbat when you come in to visit them.
There is NO paper trail for any of this money and THAT can become a problem if Medicaid is needed. There would be NO proof that this money isn't being handed to their children.
I would also like to see the proof in your statement "...you can't get most elder law attorney's to agree to conservatorship." Their own attorney suggested going to court for just this purpose. This is something they do. When our mother was refusing to consider moving ANYWHERE, our EC atty told us we could not force her to move and suggested guardianship!! We did NOT go that route, as the facility we chose for her would not accept committals.
Remember, these two elders have dementia. The whole point to appointing a POA is to have someone responsible who can manage your affairs when you are no longer capable of doing so. These people are not capable of managing anything. I still don't understand how the attorney states the OP can't intervene somehow. If not, what is the point of having the POA, other than to line the atty's pocket for that and then court too. Also, why would the bank want to block him (some banks don't honor POAs, but they ARE legal documents and they should honored.) At the least, the bank staff can SEE what the two are doing, and should question it. Someone could be bilking the money out of them and they should report suspicions to APS! In another thread, a bank did this because grandma agreed to loan g'daughter money and mom, the POA, processed it - they are being investigated for defrauding grandma! Yet it is okay for these two to withdraw 1000-1500 a month and no one blinks an eye???
He has been " involved" and IS trying to "control" this issue, but is being told by EC attorney "...without going to court for conservatorship, we can't control their spending." I don't think his intent is to prevent them from spending anything, just trying to stop the waterfall flow of money that is unaccounted for!
My question in this is WHY would anyone spend the time/money to get POAs in place if they are not worth the paper they are printed on? He should be able to divert the bulk of their money to a safe place in their names (mom&pop) at the bank, or get a trust set up. They could then be allowed a set amount for "spending" from their regular monthly income or assets. Everyone should be allowed the dignity to choose how to spend their money, but would you allow a 5 yo to have access to a lot of money, with no oversight? Same idea here, and same result - blow through it all and have nothing to show for it (or any paper trail.)
If you have to get conservatorship do it! You've got to stop the money flow now!
Id start monitoring them more closely. Do you live close by? Get their phone shut off. My dad was getting calls from Jamaica. A guy was pretending to be his friend. Trying to get $ sent to him. Mom turned the phone volume down so he wouldnt hear it ring. If you visit daily, they dont need a phone. Surprise visit so maybe you will catch someone there? Unplug phone or have it shut off. Altho someone needs to make sure they are alright.
My dad also started sending away for everything in the mail. You can get on a no more junk mail list to cut that down. Maybe get the Mail sent to you? We put my parents name on that so it helped some.
Put up a camera so you can see if anyone goes to their door. Who knows if someone is soliciting them for money. Pretending to do work for them, or be their friend visiting.
Change out the checking account register/checks for a fake one. They wont know and can write checks forever, and there is no real account. Might be easier than saying your taking it. Switch it out. Take their check book, but dont let them see. As soon as you do that there will be a huge fight.
You have to get that money flow to stop and get to the bottom of it.
My mom had to take the checkbook from my dad. She said he had lost the checks. That way he wasnt mad at her. He looked but didnt spend hrs searching.
You have got to stop that now. Good luck. How awful.
Something about this whole issue smells...
These people can't tell the difference between a $5 bill and $50 and you think all is good and they are just saving up for a cruise?
There is a 5 year look back period and large sums, like you state, are going to have to be explained. Giving away money/assets will cause them to be penalized when it is time for Medicaid to pay for a nursing home bed or other assistance. They may not even realize they are creating a future problem.
I say, go ask them about it and tell them you want to make sure they are not getting scammed or taken advantage of by someone. If one of them gets mad about you asking how their money is spent, try to explain they will not be able to get help when they need it if they give the money away. If they have used it for repairs on house/car etc, tell them you need to help them create a file for big expenses to document for Medicaid later on.
If all you get is an argument, it might be time to seek conservatorship before they create a problem that cannot be undone later on.