My dad suffered a brain injury due to years of alcohol abuse and is now in an assisted living facility against his will as he was deemed a danger to himself, my mom is living in the family home which she owns half of. My mom was my dads Guardian however she wanted to divorce him and in order to do that she had to resign as guardian(conflict of interest crap she was told). so the next person on my dads will was appointed guardian however he took his time doing shit and died unexpectedly before he finished the divorce.
After he died his 2 kids were offered to become his guardian, (i declined due to health problems of my own) and the other one lives out of country, however my moms sister and her husband asked if they could become his guardian to make sure his money was not abused and stayed safe for his kids when he died ,so i let them.
Their first act as his guardian was to cash in his kids registered education plans which my dad took out years ago( yeah that sure is helping his kids)... now for the divorce part.
In order to finish the divorce the house had to be settled, my mom wanted to get his half of the house in the divorce because he cant live in it on his own and has not lived in it in 8 years. however his guardian( my moms own sister) would not budge, so my mom offered to buy my dads half based on the value of the house of the house when he had to leave it which was 88,000 however they declined that offer as well.
Now in this process my mom made a very big mistake , when she first went to her lawyer to file for divorce which was in 2012 her lawyer told her to pick a date when she thought it was over or something with out fully explaining to her the ramifications and they agreed to pick the time he went into the nursing home (2009). When it should have been the time she signed off as his guardian(2012) As the income taxes were filed as married still at the time and she was hoping he would get better in the nursing home.
Now after declining my moms offer to buy the house for the value of what it was in 2012 my moms sister is trying to sue her saying that their is discrepancies in my dads cost of living( the nursing home) and the money that was taken out of his account for 2009-2012,( a joint account at the time) saying he is missing around $60,000+ even though they were still fucking married, my mom was still acting as his wife at that time, giving money to his kids if they needed it, using it on the house/yard as well as using it to pay back the bills that they ran up from being a married couple for over 30 years because she thought their was a slim chance he might get better in the nursing home. my moms sister is also trying to sue her saying that my mom should have been paying rent . my mom has no way to prove anything because it was so long ago, she was sometimes using her money to pay the bills, and other times she was using his money to pay bills, they brought up about $6000 being taken out which was a wedding gift to their daughter.
In 2012 when she signed off as guardian the only thing my dad has contributed towards the house is paying half the property taxes. as if living with an abusive alcoholic was not enough you gotta love shit family members who take the abusive alcoholics side. as for my dads wishes due to his memory he is living 15 years in the past and has no memory of his drinking, always calls wondering why his kids don't talk to him much, and always begs to come back home and that he does not even want a divorce etc... my mom just wants to move on with her life, cant afford the lawyer cost, and all this family backstabing is really taking a toll on her health.
However, your Mom and Dad should team up, have the divorce legally dismissed.
Seems there are protections for each spouse, such as the community spouse rules so as not to impoverish one spouse to pay for the needs of the other spouse.
However, in this case, and in the case of my uncle, I personally am so grateful not to have any answers, no
longer to be involved; etc., but I do wish you all the best.
I love it when we, as real human beings, can just kick the lawyers and government regulations hurting us - just kick them out of our lives (while still obeying laws)...imo.
And get on with living the short time available to us all...
living out that time in peace. Re: Married, filing separately??? Married, living apart??? What is so wrong about that? imo.
When a couple divorces, their assets are assessed, their current and future needs are considered, and the idea is to divide their jointly built-up finances as fairly as possible and meeting the needs of both of them as far as possible. It's a miserable process, and because it involves putting $ signs in front of absolutely everything right down to kitty litter it can feel very mercenary. But it's not sordid, it just has to be done. Your mother really mustn't be encouraged to feel that there's any virtue in saying 'fine he can keep his smelly pension.' Nuts to that! If she's entitled, she's entitled.
Your father's pension entitlement - his disability and the pension too I should think will be paid by his former employer's insurer - is one of those assets. It goes onto the table to be considered alongside everything else; and I would be surprised if your mother wasn't entitled to some proportion either of the fund or of the payments. Same goes for her pension entitlements, too, of course.
The big problem in this whole situation is going to be the cost of your father's care.
Coast, you already mentioned before that there was a hasty moment when your mother's lawyer picked on 2009, with the move into the NH, as the date of separation; and clearly the "other side", so to speak, has seized on that date with both hands and isn't letting it go. Well, they wouldn't if it suits them, would they; but they didn't come up with it themselves. It is regrettable; it should be retractable.
When is anything next happening? Any meetings or court dates scheduled or anything?
How's your mother holding up?
to be honest the way i see it is just because my dad went into a home does not mean he had to quit supporting his wife and kids and to even try and hold my mom accountable to the money spent out of his account minus the nursing home cost from 2009-2012 unless she signs off her half of the house is borderline harassment. my antis lawyer does not seem to understand the difference of physical separation and legal separation. From 2012 onward when income taxes started to be filled as separated my dad has only contributed half the property taxes and nothing towards the maintenance of the house, not a dime. which is why i think my mom offering to buy his half of the house for what the house was valued at in 2012 is more then a reasonable offer.
There is a certain logic in looking at your father's income minus his care home costs as what he ought to have left over; but it's far too simplistic a formula. Just for starters, it ignores his ongoing interest in, and therefore liabilities for, the upkeep of the home. There's plenty of wiggle room there.
Anyway, I don't why I'm rabbiting on - I'm no expert, I'm not even American. The point I hope you'll take away is that although this whole situation is a tangled PAIN for your mother, it isn't insoluble. Nothing ever is. If you can persuade her to take deep breaths, get together what information she can, and put her emotions aside for later, she'll get to the end of it all the quicker.
Be that as it may. The other key message from your post is that you are extremely angry. I don't blame you. Your mother is in a horrible and stressful situation; you feel let down, or that she's been let down, by her sister and her adviser/s; you want her ties with your father to be at an end so that she can put her unhappy marriage behind her and move on... You have a lot to be upset and angry about.
But look. When she agreed to assume guardianship for your father, your aunt - your maternal aunt, noted - accepted responsibility for your father's welfare above all. She is *obliged* to put his interests first. It is not for her to be influenced by his behaviour during the marriage, his personal merits, or the future claims of his children. I must say I'd have told her not to touch the job with a long stick, but I can admire intentions which I assume included trying to handle the situation objectively and efficiently, and (ironically enough) to minimise the opportunities for conflict.
For example: you're furious that she rejected your mother's offer for your father's share in the house. But we can have no idea of whether that offer was realistic in terms of market value, except to guess that presumably it wasn't - there being no earthly reason why your aunt wouldn't otherwise have preferred to be managing just the cash, with no bricks, mortar and emotions to worry about.
She then needs to untangle the financial history. Things like wedding presents, share of bills that your father continued to be liable for as co-owner of the property, etc. etc.: there isn't a problem here, but your mother does need to show the documentation. Again, complex, and an administrative pain in the bum, but necessary to get done. Your aunt can't just shrug and say oh well what's a few tens of thousands between friends. The rent is a puzzle; that makes me wonder if your aunt might be getting rather draconian professional advice from someone. But above all - this is a negotiation. Your aunt is legally and ethically obliged to take your father's case, as his representative and advocate. Don't shoot her down for that.
"You gotta love family members who take the abusive alcoholic's side..."
Well. Taking his side is exactly what whoever assumed the guardianship was agreeing to do. Why be angry with your aunt for doing a job that you would have accepted yourself if your health hadn't prevented you? Just because she's doing it better than you would like to see? But that's the law.